(July 2014)
Wednesday, 1 June 2016
'Old Masters' by Thomas Bernhard
One voice entirely
dominates this novel, not the voice of the narrator Atzbacher, but that of
Reger, an aging music critic who has been coming every second day for thirty
years to sit in front of Tintoretto’s Portrait of a White-Bearded Man
in Vienna’s Kunsthistorisches Museum. In the first half of the single
paragraph that floods this book with intricately structured reports of Reger’s
liberally misanthropic invective, Atzbacher arrives early to meet Reger and
observes him from another gallery, recalling things Reger has said to him on
previous occasions. In the second half, what Reger says to Atzbacher that day is
interwoven with what Reger has said during a previous meeting at a hotel,
eventually revealing details of the death of Reger’s wife, which underlies much
of the near-hysterical nihilism that Reger pours out of himself and through
everyone else. During the passages dealing with the death of Reger’s wife the
temporal structure of the narrative is more fragmented, reflecting Reger’s
distress. Atzbacher, the museum attendant Irrsigler, and, we learn, Reger’s
unnamed wife all function as nothing more than mouthpieces for Reger’s rather
Bernhardian opinions, Reger who claims that the relationship in which the
parties know as little as possible of each other is the ideal relationship, the
relationship which does not contradict his projection. Reger’s opinions, though
often sharply barbed and frequently desperately funny, are not supported by
argument and are repetitively over-inflated and generalised, undermining their
authenticity as opinions but strengthening the dominating voice of the incurably
isolated Reger. As with all Bernhard’s novels, the primary content of Old
Maters is its form. Reger’s inability to find worth in his world is
desperately ambivalent: “I am resisting this total despair about everything,
Reger said. I am now eighty-two and I am resisting this total despair about
everything tooth and nail”. The art of doing this is the art of existing against
the facts: “Art is the most sublime and the most revolting thing simultaneously,
he said. But we must make ourselves believe that there is high art and the
highest art, he said, otherwise we would despair. Even though we know that all
art ends in gaucherie and ludicrousness and in the refuse of history, like
everything else, we must, with downright self-assurance, believe in high and in
the highest art, he said. We realise what it is, a bungled, failed art, but we
need not always hold this realisation before us, because in that case we should
inevitably perish, he said.” The novel ends with Reger taking Atzbacher to a
performance of Kleist’s Broken Pitcher at the Burgtheater (“the most
hideous theatre in the world”), and in the very last line Atzbacher gets to
express an opinion of his own: “The performance was
terrible”.
Labels:
Bernhard (Thomas)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment